While industry leaders like Sam Altman and Dario Amodei tout that more compute, more data, and ever-lower loss are the keys to AGI, much of this messaging seems designed to generate PR buzz and secure funding rather than address fundamental challenges. Scaling has yielded unexpected abilities, such as improved chain‑of‑thought outputs. Yet these gains primarily come from learning the “low‑hanging fruit” — token frequencies, common word pairings, and simple grammatical structures — without fostering deep, algorithmic reasoning.
When asked to derive equations or compute complex metrics, LLMs often produce plausible-sounding but shallow responses, memorizing shortcuts without truly understanding the underlying logic.
LLMs learn in a continuous space, where small parameter adjustments capture statistical patterns rapidly. Techniques like chain‑of‑thought prompting enable them to simulate multi‑step reasoning, but these emergent behaviors are built on heuristics rather than systematic, step‑by‑step deduction. For instance, when challenged to derive the formula for capacitance between two wires or estimate FLOP requirements, many models generate generic, pattern-based answers that lack a clear logical derivation. They excel at regurgitating learned patterns but struggle to organize complex reasoning in a structured, transparent way.
To overcome these limits, researchers are exploring neuro‑symbolic methods that blend neural network adaptability with explicit, rule‑based reasoning. The vJEPA framework — championed by Yann LeCun, Meta’s chief scientist — exemplifies this approach by processing video to “document the world” in real time. Instead of relying solely on pre‑labeled text data, vJEPA builds a dynamic internal model that captures interactions and causal relationships. This world model enables the system to derive and explain complex relationships and equations, achieving the kind of structured reasoning that LLMs currently lack but humans excel at.
Additional compute and memory may further lower AI models loss by enabling them to learn patterns that are even more granular, but they won’t enable a model to learn the sophisticated algorithms required for deep reasoning. True AGI demands a fundamental shift — rethinking training objectives and architectures to integrate structured, neuro‑symbolic reasoning with neural learning.
Only by combining scaling with structural innovation can we move from parroting patterns to achieving prodigious, human-like intelligence.
--
If you have any questions or thoughts, don't hesitate to reach out. You can find me as @viksit on Twitter.